Friday, April 24, 2009

A modern day prayer to Lord


Lord,
I pray that you grant me, all of my wishes,
I pray that you hear me, please please listen.

I wish that you give me, a mansion by the beach,
Plus a car with big wheels, like one of those SUV's.

I pray that you give me,
A mobile connection with no bills,

A butler who can grill,
And a country house on the hill.

I wish that i can have,
A "successful" life,
Where money falls from every
Tree when i need.

I wish that when i go out,
It never rains on me.

I wish that when the sun shines too strongly,
There's always shade above me.

I pray that i can own at least,
One yatcht in my life,
A big white one,
With 2 decks under the sun,
Oooh, i can already imagine, what fun!!

I pray that you keep me,
Safe all my life,

I wish that in my mansion on the beach,
There are lots of plasma TV's and a nice view of the deep blue sea...

I pray that i have,
All these material things that i think i "need",

I wish that you hear me,
Hear me indeed!

This is my prayer,
My prayer to thee.

Monday, April 20, 2009

The TISS student


The recent crime against a meagre 23 year old student of TISS - Mumbai, has sent not only shock waves through the masses sentiments but also waves of fear through girls and women of the city at large.
Isn't it enough that we as girls/women have a thousand plus things to deal with on a daily basis already? And then comes the news that a girl not much diferent than us was brutally assaulted sexually by friends. Friends who she may not have known very well, but yet friends, who she innocently considered as safe to hang out with.

In a country that largely disregards it's girl child anyway (this is a fact seen even today in the mass of rural lands) and sometimes even in the bigger cities of India, girls have to anyway deal with a sense of fear in whatever they do and whatever they wear and whereever they go. It's very common for even a city girl of today's times to be subjected to lewd stares if she were to dress in what's actually a decent pair of western attire, this is probably the basic mentality inbuilt in the general masses. Forget western attire. Lewd stares in our own traditional wear is also pretty commonplace.

What irks one more is that, we deal with these issues all the time. But we anyway try our best to live a life fully by creating our own world of safety in which we build our friends and special friends and in which we make do with what we have by socialising amongst our chosen peers.

What do you do when the people you consider your own turn around and take you down and take every bit of self respect away from you.

A girl, a young student at TISS, an indian girl brought up in America, faced one of the worst if not the worst crime against her. This incident isn't an isolated case of it's kind. We read stories of this that happen around the country / world alot. However, it's incidents like this that take your heart and close it up in a way that makes you not want to make new friends or meet any new people. I mean, who knows if the next big scammer or pervert could be in the person your being introduced to.

It makes you somewhat paranoid. Paranoid when you do decide to have a night-out with friends. Because, an incident of this kind makes you want to stay alert, more alert than usual, no, you can't let go and have a good time, because you'd rather pay attention to the people or kind of people around you and your drink. It makes you fussy and scared. It makes you wonder secretly through various times of the day what that student at TISS really felt when she woke up the next morning only to figure out that her *friends* , a total of 6 of them, had raped her the night before.

Reading the news on this incident makes you think of the fact that you don't really know who your friends are.
Life's lesson has been to learn with every experience.
What about incidents like this? Does a victim ever heal? Does a victim ever feel safe again?

Life for every one is a book of issues that each is meant to deal with, live with, grow with. Or not, that's a choice.
However, any crime of this kind is downright disgraceful, unspeakable of, scary..and true.
It happened. Period.
But can we as people of the same city do anything to stop it from happening again?
Girls and women face smaller types of these incidents a thousand times through the year. In the local train, the local bus, on a local walk... it's a "push by mistake" if not a stare, it's a lewd comment if not a lewd pass, sometimes it's as bad as something one can't write about.
Respect is so dam hard to find these days isn't it. If only those 6 *friends* could be made to feel what it's really like to be in a girl's shoes.
What made them do it? We wonder. But can we really know?
Do they deserve to be punished? I think, yes. They should be somehow made to feel the exact same thing that they made their victim go through and then they should have the worst kind of punishment thrown at them.
Forgiveness in this case is not an option, they have destroyed a life. This is real. And a hard fact. Whatever the reason behind why they did what they did can never be a justification.
What audacity did these 6 young boys have, we wonder. Most of them came from good homes, good family back grounds. However, in cases of this kind, it's not influenced by where you come from at all. It's a basic feeling of thinking that you can just abuse who you want and get away with it. People in every strata of society do this. People in every strata of society are affected by it.
We read about it. We think about it.
Can we fix it?
How?
How do you fix it when the perpetrators of a crime like this were people you called friends. How do you fix it when the perpetrators are people next to you on a flight? How do you fix it when the perpetrators are sometimes members of your own family?
Can you fix it? Or can you at least try? We all wonder where we could possibly start.
From where or with who do we start?
Chilling fact is this incident and the brutal truth in it. The brutality of having to go on living, wondering...

One of my closest friends in reaction to this incident said to me: "i'd rather have been blown apart in one of the terror attacks in India than have faced a crime like this".

You know what friend?, so would i.

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

The 7 year old


The story in the recent Mumbai news about the 7 year old half-parsi child who died due to starvation and no medical treatment has been doing it's rounds and gaining it's fair share of publicity. However, most newsreports seem to only point to the fact that this child who was a half-parsi child could have been saved by the riches of the parsi trust funds and community as a whole if only they hadn't turned their backs on the fact that she wasn't a 100% parsi bred and borne kid. This story gets it's fair share of publicity all over our news, but i really wonder truly WHY?

I'm not a parsi and this article has nothing to do with religious or sectorial sentiments.
But, i really wonder how and why news reports "kind of" blame this tragic child's death on a community as a whole. The only real reason that this child's death by starvation was put in the news was because she is a half-parsi. Is that even justified?
Looking at the real country, it's pretty easy to see a large number of quick deaths of little kids due to various factors; out of which starvation may be a major cause but it's teemed with many more: medical negligence, lack of funds for treatment, lack of hygiene, poverty, poor living conditions etc. And more etc.

It's ridiculous how one child's death caught on the news while the major actual ones seen and experienced all through the country are blatantly ignored. Of course, we have our share of NGO's and volunteers doing their bit, but in a country of more than 1 billion, reaching out to every single rural child or even child in need within big metro's is hard work.
Farzin Batlivala, the aforesaid 7 year old who perished is an example of a child who was in need. When it comes to the basic question of a child in need, it is NOT about being parsi or half of it that matters. It's not even about being sikh or any other.
It's about humanity or the lack of.
Farzin's tragic story reached the news because she died due to starvation whilst her mother was away at work trying to earn a meagre salary to help bring home the food. The mother and children were abandoned by Ferzin's parsi father and Ferzin's pleas to the parsi trust to try and get their help wasn't successful because they needed proof that the mother (a non-parsi) had in fact married a parsi.

Imagine the mother's sentiments when she tries to help her children, but can't. Imagine the mother's sentiment when she is abandoned and has to take care of her children herself and just about barely can.

This story without the parsi twist thrown in actually happens openly in many many many corners of the world we live in, it's not a story sidelined only for mumbai or parsi's. It's a story that plays out in general alot.
But, in our world, we'd choose to help a certain criteria of people only. We divide and discriminate on the basis of religion, color,sect. Even if alot of us try to live in and create a world with no bias, the fact of the matter is that the sentiments of discrimmination are deeply imbibed in our own blood and we would unconsciously let it influence what we do or who with and how we interact.

This story of a young 7 year old's death caught on the news. In another part of the world the same back ground story of a lone and abandoned parent trying to raise her child would play out with the difference being that the child was of another caste / sect and died due to...

Why do we have this gnawing need to mention or even consider the color, caste or sect.
Maybe cause it helps to blame it on someone or something else? Maybe cause it helps us clear our own conscience? Why?

The bottomline is, a child died.
There could have been help given.
Help could come from you or me.
Fact is, help doesnt "have" to come from someone or some sect in particular.
It can just be us, in general.

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

The ones from MSN contribute

------
Between 2006/07, P.S. contributed some poetic art form online to msn's contributions for writers. Herebelow are 3 works from that category:
1-Just a little more
2-The world so big
3-A walk in the park
------

Just a little more
-Friday, November 23, 2007
As on MSN Contribute:
http://content.msn.co.in/Contribute/Others/UCStory5006.htm

Just a little more,
Just a little bit more,
Come on now, don't count the score, just a bit little more.
Spread the word - the word of love,
Love who you are and not what you could be.
Cause if you do, there wouldn't be wars,
Wouldn't be doors, knocked on by beggars and more.
So just a little bit more,
Spread the word of love,
Love the people you see,
Cause without them, see, the point is, you wouldn't be.
This is one world. There should be one love.
Spread the word of love,
Come on now, just a little bit more.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The world so Big.
-Monday, July 30, 2007
As on MSN Contribute:
http://content.msn.co.in/Contribute/Others/UCStory3414.htm

So much to do,
So much to see.
So many places to be.

So many people,
All these lives,
Days wear on,
I walk on by.

The world so big,
Comfort in this.

Although I’m alone,
I’m never really alone.

By myself not,
Cause there’s so much to do,
So much to see,
So many places to be.

The day starts here,
The night ends there,
Yet, I’m never alone.
The shield of the world.
So big,
Comfort in this.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Walk in the Park.
-
Tuesday, June 05, 2007

This story has been read 438 times. On Msn India contribute Site:
http://content.msn.co.in/Contribute/Others/UCStory2604.htm

A walk in the park,
Left to my thoughts in the dark,
A walk in the park,
Surrounded by flowers,
Under the stars,
With my flutterring heart,
A walk in the park,
In the center of nature's heart,
The warmth is the start,
Of new beginnings,
New Laughs,
Something as simple,
As a walk in the park,
Dew drops that spark,
New beginnings, new laughs,
Just a simple walk in the park,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Friday, April 3, 2009

Flick Flick vs Chick Flick: it really doesn't matter.


Cinema has always appealed to me. Most of us watch movies as a form of enjoyment and entertainment or maybe because we may just think that the hot actor / actress in a certain movie is worth watching a movie for! It wasn't for nothing that the term "die-hard fan" was coined afterall.

However, my personal interest in cinema falls within the criteria of looking for intelligent and good storylines in a movie's script, i judge movies, i'm not afraid to say so. I come from a background of artistic artists (hee hee) and be it hollywood flicks or the closer to home bollywood flicks, i watch most movies that seem appealing. No, don't get me wrong, i'm not a movie "lover", but yeah, i enjoy my dose of them once in a way.
Books are my preferred choice of a way to chill-out, but anyway, to get to the point of this note:

If someone were to ask me what kind of movie i liked, i'd probably say, "them action flicks - with the guns and goons, or any real comedy that turns into a laugh riot for me".

See, the point is, i dont hate or dislike any genre of movies. Within entertainment we have movies / plays / music shows and then further on within the range of cinema we have the various types of cinema. Action, love dramas, horror, sci-fi, CHICK FLICKS.

We like categorising, don't we? Sure we do. We label people, ourselves, our enemies and friends and also movies and more. Maybe we all do this to feel less confused in general, i would'nt really know and don't care to. Cause i label everything and maybe everyone too!
But, it sure helps to know what "type of movie" is likeable by anyone by labelling them.

What's funny is how we make our choices and preferrences but don't stay real to it.
I'd like to take the example of "chick-flicks" at this point.

Let's remember one thing, - no movie is a bad movie.
It's just that, everyone can have a different opinion and say in any matter, in general.
Further to that, no "genre of movie" is bad or "shameful to like".. Really.

A movie maker goes through an immense ordeal to coordinate the production, casting, script,post production, marketing and editing criteria of a movie only to have it cut and showcased to people like - us.

We can like it. Love it. Hate it. Or just enjoy it.
But, it's funny how we debate it, sometimes even have riots because of it, sometimes even get it banned.
The point is, everyone has a story to tell. Everyone has a story, basically. Whether to tell it or not is a different matter.

A movie maker shows his story to a million more people than you and i do.
Because he likes to and wants to.

So, this is how, amongst the varied categories of movies came known the "chick flicks" base.
Chick flicks are ideally (apparently) the kind of movies that chicks would like , or more so, the types of movies that "typical girly girls" would want to watch (apparently). And this base of movies is also the one that gets the shadiest and soddiest reactions. Majority of us people would have a 1st reaction that goes "oh my goodness, how CAN you say you want to watch THAT movie", or, "Yuck, i don't want to go for such a girly film". It's also superly crazy when it's usually a girl who comes up with a reaction like that.

People, seriously, it doesnt matter. You dont have to disregard a movie because it falls in a certain category of films being made.
If you really ask yourself in deep thought, it's not that you really don't WANT to watch a movie that could be a chick flick, it's because you're scared of what people would say or think of you if you did.
It's just a movie. Anyone who just refuses to see a "chick flick" because it's a "chick flick", is being plain... well, is being plain. hmm.

It's a movie! only. Nothing more. You don't have to watch , but then you surely don't have the right to hate it without even watching it. Who knows, it could have been a good movie afterall. You can't say. Cause you didn't see it.

The problem is, we're all ignorant. And we live by what people would say or think or feel.
Nonsense.

A movie is a movie be it any "kind" of movie. Hate it if you like, but form an opinion for yourself after watching it, not before. And, don't use other opinions. For your own good, remember that, that's precisely where the starting of ignorance arises from.

Personally, for me, i like action flicks. With them guns and goons.
But, i wouldn't not watch a movie because it was a chick flick or any other type of flick. I'd watch it if the story sounded entertaining and appealing enough.

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Confessions of a shopaholic


*why i watched the movie*:

A girl sometimes feels the need to watch what we generally term as "chick flicks". Why? Probably because it's an unexplainable girl thing. Some girls prefer to only watch chick flicks all the time, whereas some like watching a wide range of cinema and sometimes lean toward the "wanting to watch a chick flick" feeling at some point of time. I think, rather, i do believe that i fall in the latter category!

So, some day on some busy week, when my friend and I felt like going through a chick flick, we decided to check out the newest one of the time "Confessions of a shopaholic".


*what i felt about the movie*:

I went into the movie hall hoping to be shown a movie that is a complete pink frilled comedy cum uplifting chick movie. Was it? To some little extent, perhaps.

As the name suggests (this movie was based on a book by the same name by the way!), anyway, as the name suggests, the movie is about a young female journalist (it's a wonder that most of us would assume that the lead "shopaholic" is a woman, it "could" have been a man, i'm sure there do exist some men shoppers who could go overboard!) who shops not just for pleasure but for needless need.

The only good show point of the movie i think was the lead actress "Isla Fisher". She was cute and played the role of a "young working girl" cum "fashionista in debt" well.


However, the story as such was'nt exactly a rewarding experience. Most chick flicks are just fun and random themes, however Confessions was more of a let down as a chick flick. It had it's funny moments here and there but on the whole, it was, just was.


The story goes: young female journalist shops alot, loves stores, can't not buy nice, new, good, expensive clothes and accessories, splurges almost all the time, sometimes even *lusts* for new clothes, gets into debt, looses job, by chance gets offered another job in a magazine called "Successful Saving" which is part of a publication group that also owns a high profile fashion magazine, so young female shopaholic accepts job at Succesful Savings so that she can maybe anyway move to the fashion magazine as a writer; while in Succesful Savings, falls for boss whilst trying to evade the Debt collector who keeps cropping up every now and again. I'm sure by now you'd have guessed the ending. A big misunderstanding, pleadings for forgiveness and anyway landing up with the boss was how it ended.

The story is predictable and pink. I'm not entirely saying that it was a waste of a movie. It was OK for the moment's fun.

It's surely not a "must-watch" though.

Fashion followers could probably love the movie for the clothes, although i don't think all the clothes showcased were coolly amazing either.


But the movie did get me thinking. It got me thinking to what extent i myself may be a shopper who craves for fine taste myself, to be honest, i don't shop alot, but when i do walk by a store, i can't help looking at the window displays wondering if i should buy / not buy. Most women are like that i reckon! The one part of the movie that any girl would probably relate well too is the part where Isla Fisher craves to shop and can't stop. It's hard to curb what you like doing best after all, ain't it? But, we all ain't shopaholics...that's why they made a story on her and not us!


The general feeling after the movie ended wasn't the usual "how cute" after a chick flick is over, it was more of the, "oh ok, well, yeah ok".

The audience here probably wouldn't take to the story 100% for other reasons. India is a country of savings. For sure, we do buy alot, individually and as families. However, a young working "fashionista for fun" based out of New York would probably know to a larger level and feel more from this movie what it tries to tell.


Entertainment wise, the moment of watching was reasonably OK. I wouldn't think of this movie a second time and let's just end this by saying that if i saw it playing on home TV again, i'd give it a pass unless i was very deep in one of them "chick flick" moods. Very deep. Otherwise, pass...


I think i'll stay off the chick flick mode for a while. A while that's longer than short...